<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dominance of Small Code Contributions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dirkriehle.com/2008/09/23/the-dominance-of-small-code-contributions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dirkriehle.com/2008/09/23/the-dominance-of-small-code-contributions/</link>
	<description>Dirk Riehle&#039;s blog about everything computer science, applied and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:23:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Nielsen &#187; Biweekly links for 01/30/2009</title>
		<link>http://dirkriehle.com/2008/09/23/the-dominance-of-small-code-contributions/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Nielsen &#187; Biweekly links for 01/30/2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riehle.org/?p=324#comment-215</guid>
		<description>[...] The Dominance of Small Code Contributions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Dominance of Small Code Contributions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk Riehle</title>
		<link>http://dirkriehle.com/2008/09/23/the-dominance-of-small-code-contributions/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Riehle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 21:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riehle.org/?p=324#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Ralph Johnson commented on &lt;a href=&quot;http://pulse.plaxo.com/pulse/events/show/92292102#addComment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Plaxo Pulse&lt;/a&gt; but I prefer to discuss it here :-)

From Ralph: &quot;An interesting question is what percent of the code comes from commits of 100 lines or less. Look only at the last commit that modified a line. Suppose that every line of code in Linux was tagged with the number of lines in the last commit that touched it. What fraction of the lines would have a label less than 10? Less than 100?&quot;

Short answer, well more of a question: You are asking not about the percentage of activity that small commits represent but the total amount of work? I&#039;m pretty sure we can calculate that but wouldn&#039;t it just be the integral of the commit size distribution? (And then take the 1-100 SLoC range percentage of the total distribution?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralph Johnson commented on <a href="http://pulse.plaxo.com/pulse/events/show/92292102#addComment" rel="nofollow">Plaxo Pulse</a> but I prefer to discuss it here <img src='http://dirkriehle.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>From Ralph: &#8220;An interesting question is what percent of the code comes from commits of 100 lines or less. Look only at the last commit that modified a line. Suppose that every line of code in Linux was tagged with the number of lines in the last commit that touched it. What fraction of the lines would have a label less than 10? Less than 100?&#8221;</p>
<p>Short answer, well more of a question: You are asking not about the percentage of activity that small commits represent but the total amount of work? I&#8217;m pretty sure we can calculate that but wouldn&#8217;t it just be the integral of the commit size distribution? (And then take the 1-100 SLoC range percentage of the total distribution?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bread and Circuits &#187; Big wins come from thinking small</title>
		<link>http://dirkriehle.com/2008/09/23/the-dominance-of-small-code-contributions/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Bread and Circuits &#187; Big wins come from thinking small</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riehle.org/?p=324#comment-213</guid>
		<description>[...] when Chris pointed me to another FSOSS alumni, Dirk Riele of SAP Labs, who has just published a study that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when Chris pointed me to another FSOSS alumni, Dirk Riele of SAP Labs, who has just published a study that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk Riehle</title>
		<link>http://dirkriehle.com/2008/09/23/the-dominance-of-small-code-contributions/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Riehle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riehle.org/?p=324#comment-212</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an important point---speaks to enabling the wisdom of the crowds---i.e. you want diversity in your innovation and input.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an important point&#8212;speaks to enabling the wisdom of the crowds&#8212;i.e. you want diversity in your innovation and input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morten Blaabjerg</title>
		<link>http://dirkriehle.com/2008/09/23/the-dominance-of-small-code-contributions/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Morten Blaabjerg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riehle.org/?p=324#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Your study nicely confirms everything Clay Shirky says about power law distributions in &quot;Here Comes Everybody&quot;. The results are not surprising - they confirm everything known from other such open social systems, such as those Shirky gives a look in his book - f. ex. photo distributions on Flickr tagged &quot;mermaid parade&quot; or &quot;Iraq&quot;.

An important point about power law distributions (as Shirky also notes in the book) is that the one line code change no. 517 may also be the one which closes a vital security hole. So &quot;closed&quot; systems, such as companies which can only hire so many people, may lose out from a lot of vital input and value, even if it seems at a glance only 20% of contributors are doing the major parts of the work being done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your study nicely confirms everything Clay Shirky says about power law distributions in &#8220;Here Comes Everybody&#8221;. The results are not surprising &#8211; they confirm everything known from other such open social systems, such as those Shirky gives a look in his book &#8211; f. ex. photo distributions on Flickr tagged &#8220;mermaid parade&#8221; or &#8220;Iraq&#8221;.</p>
<p>An important point about power law distributions (as Shirky also notes in the book) is that the one line code change no. 517 may also be the one which closes a vital security hole. So &#8220;closed&#8221; systems, such as companies which can only hire so many people, may lose out from a lot of vital input and value, even if it seems at a glance only 20% of contributors are doing the major parts of the work being done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

