<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FOSSBazaar: Open Source Under the CIO&#039;s Radar Screen: Good or Bad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dirkriehle.com/2008/05/15/fossbazaar-open-source-under-the-cios-radar-screen-good-or-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dirkriehle.com/2008/05/15/fossbazaar-open-source-under-the-cios-radar-screen-good-or-bad/</link>
	<description>Dirk Riehle&#039;s blog about everything computer science, applied and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 12:06:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Dixon</title>
		<link>http://dirkriehle.com/2008/05/15/fossbazaar-open-source-under-the-cios-radar-screen-good-or-bad/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>James Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 22:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riehle.org/?p=101#comment-182</guid>
		<description>So far the consensus seems to be that IT loves open source : Week nominated open source as one of the 10 things that IT was mot thankful for in 2006. IT likes it because they can get more things done within the budget they have.

CIO&#039;s on the other hand are less favorable. In many cases they don&#039;t know how much open source is being used. They are the people who have to deal with governance and risk.

You have your main statement backwards. When a company comes to get a subscription for open source its often because they already have one or more instances of it in use and they want to manage internal risk. This is the basis of the business model - sales and marketing expenses are hugely reduced because the consumer can prove to their satisfaction that the software does what they need it to. Only then does the consumer need to engage as a customer if they want help managing the risk.

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far the consensus seems to be that IT loves open source : Week nominated open source as one of the 10 things that IT was mot thankful for in 2006. IT likes it because they can get more things done within the budget they have.</p>
<p>CIO&#8217;s on the other hand are less favorable. In many cases they don&#8217;t know how much open source is being used. They are the people who have to deal with governance and risk.</p>
<p>You have your main statement backwards. When a company comes to get a subscription for open source its often because they already have one or more instances of it in use and they want to manage internal risk. This is the basis of the business model &#8211; sales and marketing expenses are hugely reduced because the consumer can prove to their satisfaction that the software does what they need it to. Only then does the consumer need to engage as a customer if they want help managing the risk.</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

