<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SE Radio Interview on Open Source Business Models</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dirkriehle.com/2008/04/23/se-radio-interview-on-open-source-business-models/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dirkriehle.com/2008/04/23/se-radio-interview-on-open-source-business-models/</link>
	<description>Dirk Riehle&#039;s blog about everything computer science, applied and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:25:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dirk Riehle</title>
		<link>http://dirkriehle.com/2008/04/23/se-radio-interview-on-open-source-business-models/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Riehle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 19:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riehle.org/?p=93#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Ah, OK. I&#039;m not aware right now of any particular writings on this topic, though the blogs are of course full of claims (incl. mine) that open source represents an effective sales strategy.

As a counter example, derived from yours, you can compare SalesForce.com and SugarCRM. It does not appear that SalesForce is slowing down because of Sugar, so there clearly is more to business success than Open Source (who would have thought :-)

The way I hear it, first of all, the product needs to be right, and after that open source is an added benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, OK. I&#8217;m not aware right now of any particular writings on this topic, though the blogs are of course full of claims (incl. mine) that open source represents an effective sales strategy.</p>
<p>As a counter example, derived from yours, you can compare SalesForce.com and SugarCRM. It does not appear that SalesForce is slowing down because of Sugar, so there clearly is more to business success than Open Source (who would have thought <img src='http://dirkriehle.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The way I hear it, first of all, the product needs to be right, and after that open source is an added benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://dirkriehle.com/2008/04/23/se-radio-interview-on-open-source-business-models/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 19:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riehle.org/?p=93#comment-225</guid>
		<description>Dirk,

I am asking if you know of any research/writing that explores how greatly disadvantaged a competitor is if it tries to compete with the originator of an open source product. A (very theoretical) example would be Siebel (Oracle) trying to compete with SugarCRM with a new product based on the SugarCRM open source codebase. 

Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dirk,</p>
<p>I am asking if you know of any research/writing that explores how greatly disadvantaged a competitor is if it tries to compete with the originator of an open source product. A (very theoretical) example would be Siebel (Oracle) trying to compete with SugarCRM with a new product based on the SugarCRM open source codebase. </p>
<p>Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk Riehle</title>
		<link>http://dirkriehle.com/2008/04/23/se-radio-interview-on-open-source-business-models/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Riehle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 07:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riehle.org/?p=93#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Martin, thanks for the compliment, I&#039;m glad you liked it.

Are you asking about how a competitor is put at a disadvantage by a commercial open source firm&#039;s strategy, or are you asking how a competitor can utilize the open source firm&#039;s code base for its own advantage? Or, how the dual-license strategy hinders a competitor from using the open source firm&#039;s code base?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin, thanks for the compliment, I&#8217;m glad you liked it.</p>
<p>Are you asking about how a competitor is put at a disadvantage by a commercial open source firm&#8217;s strategy, or are you asking how a competitor can utilize the open source firm&#8217;s code base for its own advantage? Or, how the dual-license strategy hinders a competitor from using the open source firm&#8217;s code base?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://dirkriehle.com/2008/04/23/se-radio-interview-on-open-source-business-models/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 07:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riehle.org/?p=93#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Very interesting interview. Refreshing to hear some straight talk about OSS business models. Do you know of any writings that deal in more detail with a competitor&#039;s disadvantages in using a competing company&#039;s open sourced code to build/enhance a competing product?

Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting interview. Refreshing to hear some straight talk about OSS business models. Do you know of any writings that deal in more detail with a competitor&#8217;s disadvantages in using a competing company&#8217;s open sourced code to build/enhance a competing product?</p>
<p>Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
